October 31, 2025
DLC Launches Preemptive PR Message Before V6.0 Drop

Strategic messaging highlights collaborative tone before unveiling stricter technical requirements
The DesignLights Consortium doesn’t typically have its public relations consultant send personal notes to trade reporters. Yet on Wednesday, the DLC’s longtime PR representative emailed individual media contacts a short message drawing attention to the organization’s new blog post ahead of next week’s much-anticipated Version 6.0 launch. It was a subtle but notable shift for an organization more often perceived as a rule-maker than a marketer.
The piece, titled “You Spoke, We Listened: How Your Feedback Shaped DLC SSL V6.0 and LUNA V2.0,” carried the tone of a soft-launch press kit. It positioned DLC as an attentive collaborator and opened with the aspirational line:
“Progress happens through constructive collaboration. The DLC’s success depends on the earned trust of our efficiency program members, manufacturers, industry experts, and the broader market.”
The message was clear: before the new technical rules drop, DLC wants to be seen not as an enforcer, but as a partner.
A Softer Launch
The blog describes the forthcoming SSL V6.0 and LUNA V2.0 standards as the first major overhaul in five years — “shaped by over 1,000 stakeholder comments, multiple webinars, and collaborative discussions.” It credits feedback from utilities, implementers, and manufacturers, and highlights procedural wins: faster verification, simplified documentation, and links between Qualified Products List (QPL) entries and manufacturer spec sheets.
For utilities facing rising data-center loads, DLC says it’s providing “better tools to validate savings.” For manufacturers, it promises “reduced testing redundancy” and optional new ANSI/IES test pathways. Even the environmental narrative gets its moment: LUNA V2.0 adds a “Turtle Lighting” category to protect coastal habitats and support dark-sky ordinances in “over 900 municipalities and counties.”
The Harder Questions
But the blog also arrives at a moment of visible friction. Many manufacturers are balking at the proposed efficacy thresholds, which they describe as “extremely challenging, if not impossible” for certain fixture families. Meeting the new bar, some say, would require costly redesigns that under-drive LEDs just to stay compliant—projects that could easily exceed six figures per product line.
Those concerns have circulated for months, through letters, podcasts, and trade discussions that question whether the new standards align with market realities. The DLC’s latest post doesn’t confront those critiques directly. Instead, it leans heavily on process and tone — an attempt, perhaps, to calm the room before unveiling the final rule.
“Together, we translate feedback into meaningful updates,” the post declares, a refrain meant to signal responsiveness without acknowledging where, exactly, feedback altered the outcome.
The collaborative language is smart PR. But whether the listening leads to reversal on the most objectionable elements—efficacy levels, associated testing costs, and timelines — remains to be seen.
Priming the Conversation
It’s rare to see DLC proactively shape its own narrative. The group has spent much of the past year responding to criticism from manufacturers and distributors calling the certification process burdensome, expensive and opaque. This time, it’s getting ahead of the reaction.
By seeding its message through media early, DLC ensures that next week’s conversations begin on its preferred footing: collaboration, trust, and shared mission. As one passage frames it, the 6.0 launch is “a watershed moment that won’t come along again for at least another decade.”
That’s classic inoculation language — the kind meant to remind readers that discomfort equals progress.
What Comes Next
It’s unclear whether the goodwill campaign will end here. Given the stakes, it wouldn’t be surprising to see additional PR maneuvers during reveal week and in the months that follow — perhaps more testimonials, more data dashboards, maybe even a follow-up blog linking specific feedback to final revisions.
If so, that would be a notable evolution for an organization known more for technical bulletins than narrative arcs. And it would signal that DLC understands the optics: that 6.0 isn’t just a specification release — it’s a reputational stress test.
The organization is emphasizing listening, collaboration, and partnership. Whether that language will translate into policy changes, or merely smoother headlines, will determine how much of the industry truly feels heard.









